Kasey+Retzlaff

=Newton's Second Law Experiment=

media type="custom" key="11297720"

Very good Show Me presentation. I would suggest that you speak up. These apps often require you to speak louder than you normally would. Your explanations were very well done. The second data set was an inverse variation and if you look closely at your data points, they suggest an inverse curve rather than a straight line. You did some sample calculations, but you should also do one for acceleration. 28/30
 * M_glider (g) || M_hanging (g) || t_1 (s) || t_2 (s) || t_3 (s) || V_1 (cm/s) || V_2 (cm/s) || A cm/s^2 || F_a (dynes) ||
 * ~  ||~   ||~   ||~ First Data Set ||~   ||~   ||~   ||~   ||~   ||
 * 300 || 5 || 0.455 || 0.245 || 1.881 || 22 || 40.8 || 10.2 || 4900 ||
 * 290 || 15 || 0.3 || 0.174 || 1.046 || 33.3 || 57.5 || 22.1 || 14700 ||
 * 270 || 35 || 0.15 || 0.085 || 0.553 || 66.7 || 118 || 92.8 || 34800 ||
 * 230 || 75 || 0.103 || 0.058 || 0.372 || 97.1 || 172 || 201 || 73500 ||
 * 190 || 115 || 0.082 || 0.046 || 0.293 || 122 || 217 || 324 || 112700 ||
 * ~  ||~   ||~   ||~ Second Data Set ||~   ||~   ||~   ||~   ||~   ||
 * 190 || 115 || 0.082 || 0.046 || 0.293 || 122 || 217 || 324 || 112700 ||
 * 230 || 115 || 0.086 || 0.048 || 0.311 || 116 || 208 || 296 || 112700 ||
 * 270 || 115 || 0.089 || 0.052 || 0.317 || 112 || 192 || 252 || 112700 ||
 * 310 || 115 || 0.093 || 0.054 || 0.332 || 108 || 185 || 232 || 112700 ||
 * 390 || 115 || 0.101 || 0.058 || 0.359 || 99 || 172 || 203 || 112700 ||
 * 390 || 115 || 0.101 || 0.058 || 0.359 || 99 || 172 || 203 || 112700 ||